California Workers' Comp Biased Against Women, New Lawsuit Claims

Posted By Thomas F. Martin, PLC || 7-Jul-2016

California’s Division of Workers Compensation (DWC) is feeling the pressure after a group of several women and a labor union has filed a lawsuit against it. The suit, which may be escalated to class action status, alleges that the state-run workers’ compensation programs are biased against women based on their sex alone. The plaintiffs believe the American Medical Association (AMA) guide used by the DWC to determine disability and benefits eligibility is largely gender-based and was constructed by medical examiners who are mostly male.

One of the keystone plaintiffs in the lawsuit is Sergeant Janice Page, who spent more than 26 years with a law enforcement agency in the state. After developing breast cancer, her medical evaluator determined it was likely caused by her years of service that often exposed her to dangerous chemicals, narcotics, and other toxins. Her breast was removed to prevent the spread of the cancer and Sgt. Page reports ongoing numbness and persistent psychological harm due to the mastectomy. Despite her suffering, the AMA guide used determined she had “no permanently disability” due to the work-related health issue.

Comparisons Reveal the Problem

The lawsuit used comparisons to similar cases to define the problem and strengthen their claim. If a man has his prostate removed due to cancer, the same AMA guide that granted Sgt. Page no disability benefits can see the man as up to 20% impaired. Furthermore, the United States Veterans Administration has determined that mastectomies cause at least 30% disability, and upwards of 80%.

The lawsuit against California’s DWC is also put forth by a female telecommunications employee who was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome in both of her hands. Even though the symptoms are often considered crippling, she was assigned only “lesser permanent disability payments.” Why not full or total benefits? Her medical examiner cited that some of her disability was caused by both her age and sex.

Seeking to Set Things Right

Despite the widespread implications of the problem of sexism in California’s Division of Workers Compensation, the lawsuit does not actually seek any compensatory damages. It only wants to remove the gender stereotypes from the system completely so that women in the future do not have to endure the same struggle. If the lawsuit is successful, additional legislation with updated wording and definitions may be required to correct the issue.

At Thomas F. Martin, PLC, for more than 25 years we have been adamant fighters for workers’ rights and fair treatment. Every day we hear from new clients or read new articles about people being denied workers’ compensation benefits for unjust reasons, and this recent story is yet another example. Unfair denial is a serious problem in California, and we are proud to be a key part of a growing solution. If you have been denied workers’ compensation, contact our Orange County and Santa Ana workers’ comp attorneys today and we would be happy to provide you with a no-cost initial consultation. Together, we can reach a positive outcome to your case.

Get in Touch Today

Important Note: By completing this form you are not retaining legal services. The purpose of this questionnaire is to assist us in evaluating your potential case. Please be aware that all legal information contained herein is for informational purposes only. Providing said information does not in any form – oral, written, or otherwise – create, establish, or develop any legal relationship between Thomas F. Martin, PLC and the reader of the information on this site. Furthermore, the entry of any data into any electronic form contained within this site does not create, establish, or develop a legal relationship between Thomas F. Martin, PLC and the individual(s) who enters such data. Our legal services can only be obtained after a written retainer agreement is signed by the client and Thomas F. Martin, PLC, and under no other circumstances.